资源导向型的异类传感器网络协议

资源导向型的异类传感器网络协议

ROP: A Resource Oriented Protocol for Heterogeneous Sensor Networks

Yong Ma*, Siddharth Dala1**, Majd Alwan**, James Aylor*

*Medical Automation Research Center
University of Virginia Health System
Charlottesville VA 22908

*Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
University of Virginia
Charlottesville VA 22904

详细文章:

资源导向型的异类传感器网络协议

ABSTRACT: Sensor networks have been an active area of research during the past several years. Much previous work deals with issues related to networks having homogenous sensor nodes. In reality, sensors with different radio coverage, power capacity, and processing capabilities are deployed. In addition, not all of the sensors are mobile or have the same mobility freedom or mobility attributes (e.g. speed). The architecture and routing protocol for this type of  heterogeneous sensor network must be based on  the resources and characteristics of their member  nodes. In this paper, we propose a network model  that is adaptively formed according to the resources of its members. A protocol named  Resource Oriented Protocol (ROP) was developed to build the network model. This protocol principally entails two phases. In the topology formation phase, nodes report their available resource characteristics , based on which network architecture is optimally built . We stress that due to the existence of nodes with limitless resources, a top-down appointment process can build the architecture with minimum consumption of resources. In the topology update phase, mobile sensors and isolated sensors are accepted into the network with an optimal balance of resources. To avoid overhead of periodic route updates, we use a reactive strategy to maintain route cache. This paper provides encouraging simulation results of ROP in GlomoSim.

…………

7. Conclusion

In this paper, we describe a network model that is adaptively formed according to the resources of its members. A protocol we named Resource Oriented Protocol (ROP) was developed to create the network model. This protocol entails two phases: topology formation and topology update.

In the topology formation phase, first, sensors report their characteristics of available resources, and then local cluster heads aggregate these reports and send to sensors with largest resource capacity (LRC). After this step, based on the reports, LRCs decide the topology and appoint  cluster heads from the top to bottom levels. In the topology update phase, sensors maintain their route cache reactively. We stress in ROP that energy efficiency cannot always result in longer system lifetime especially in heterogeneous
networks. Instead, balancing resources among  sensors and saving energy for those more resource-constrained sensors are greatly helpful in lengthening the overall system lifetime. The simulation results in GlomoSim show that ROP can build the topology of a heterogeneous sensor network efficiently and the routes based upon the topology are quite appropriate for balancing resources among sensors in the network.
In general, our Resource Oriented Protocol has several unique characteristics. First, network topology is based on the resources of its member sensors. Sensors with larger resource capacity have more communication and computational workload. Therefore, the lifetime of the whole network is lengthened by minimizing workload on battery-powered nodes. Second, several powerful sensors play the major role in defining network architecture and transferring messages, which once again saves limited resources of more energy-constrained sensors. Third, it considers the  location and characteristics of mobility. Only in clusters whose members have moved will change structure. Finally, since the model takes resources of each sensor into consideration, a security model designed for heterogeneous sensor networks can easily fit into this architecture. Such a security model suited for resource constrained sensor network is our future research direction. We aim to enhance such sensor networks to vastly  improve data privacy and security. The targeted areas of applications include tele-health applications, health care facilities and other care settings, in addition to more secure automation applications.

Acknowledgement The authors would like to thank Mr. Steve Kell, General Manager at the Medical Automation Research Center, for the enriching discussions

that helped refine the ideas implemented in this protocol and for kindly reviewing the manuscript.

References
[1]S. Tilak, N. B. Abu-Ghazaleh, and W. Heinzelman, “A Taxonomy of  Wireless Micro-Sensor Network Models”, Mobile Computing and Communications Review, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 28-36, April 2002
[2]T. Rappaport, “Wireless Communications: Principles and Practice,” Prentice Hall Publications, NJ, 1996
[3]M. Takai, L. Bajaj, R, Ahuja, R. Bagrodia and M. Gerla, “GloMoSim: A Scalable Network Simulation Environment,” Technical report 990027, UCLA,Computer Science Department, 1999.
[4]C. E. Perkins and E. M. Royer. “Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing.” Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, New Orleans, LA, February 1999, pp.90-100.
[5]D. B. Johnson and D. A. Maltz, “Dynamic source routing in ad hoc wireless networks,” in Mobile Computing, Imielinski and Korth, Eds. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996, vol. 353.
[6]J. Kulik, W. R. Heinzelman, and H. Balakrishnan,“Negotiation-based Protocols for Disseminating Information in Wireless Sensor Networks,” In ACM Wireless Networks, Vol. 8. 2002.
[7]C. Intanagonwiwat, R. Govindan, and D. Estrin, “Directed Diffusion: A Scalable and Robust Communication Paradigm for Sensor Networks”, Proc.of ACM MOBICOM, 2000.
[8]W.Heinzelman,A. Chandrakasan and H.Balakrishnan,`Ènergy-Efficient Communication Protocol for Wireless Microsensor  Networks,” Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS ’00), January 2000.
[9]D. Estrin, R. Govindan, J. Heidemann, and S. Kumar. “Next century challenges: Scalable coordination in sensor networks,” In MOBICOM 1999, pages 263– 270. ACM Press.
[10] G. Pei, M. Gerla and T.-W. Chen. “Fisheye State Routing in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks,” In Proceedings of the 2000 ICDCS Workshops, Taipei, Taiwan, Apr. 2000, pp. D71-D78.
[11] M. Gerla G. Pei and X. Hong. “Lanmar: Landmark routing for large scale wireless ad hoc networks with group mobility,” In Proceedings of the First IEEE/ACM Workshop on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHOC), August 2000.